Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MarcellusLion's avatar

The Tigers had Ernie Harrell (radio) and George Kell (TV) from childhood until into my 30s. It was like they experienced the game with the players because they personally knew them! And we did kind of know the players personally through the announcers. Also, the players were with the team to stay - unless there was a big trade. Al Kaline, Norm Cash, Jim Northrup, Denny McClain, Rubber Arm Lolich, Willie Horton, Bill Freehan, Ole Paw Paw Maxwell, Gates Brown, on and on. You got to know your guys, and they were loyal to the fans. Now many watchers can hardly name the players. Unfortunately it is too much contract price now. When Al Kaline got a $100,000 contract offer, he told the management no one was worth that much! Different era, different focus, different fans, different players, and different announcers. Anyone who lived that era misses it badly!

Justin Alston's avatar

Great read. I still prefer the old style of watching before the silly K-zone box was put up live. It takes away the guessing game of whether, as a viewer, I think it is a ball or strike before the ump makes the call. Now, we have to assume while watching live, that the ump sees it exactly as the screen zone shows us.

I also find it more difficult to focus on the pitch being caught. You often can't see it hit the catcher's mitt because they dot the location with a small white circle as soon as it gets to the zone.

I always liked it when the replay added the K-zone after the pitch just to see for accuracy purpose, but it definitely takes aways from the lexperience while watching live, which is too bad. Keep things simple. Makes it better. Makes us pay attention more as well.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?