7 Comments
User's avatar
Garry Drake's avatar

One thing I’ve noticed is that during the broadcasts, the increased efficiency has diminished some of the great booth moments, the extra stories and history viewers can learn while there are some down moments. Some games are so quick that there’s only time for the play by play and a few extra notes, but stories are left half finished or rushed as they need to cut to commercial. Younger viewers may not mind, and social media will fill in those stories of great hitters vs pitchers (I love reading about Greg Maddux’s otherworldly stats), but we used to get that during the games themselves. I am not ranting against the much-needed progress, but it’s a change I’ve noticed lately.

Mark Kolier's avatar

I've been listening to games more often lately and doing that restores a familiarity in the patter and pace of baseball. Watching is not always better!

Justin Alston's avatar

Listening to baseball still feels the same, no doubt. You can be doing other things and a great commentator on the radio can put you in the moment. It's the only sport I enjoy listening to because of the slower pace. It gives you a chance to picture the plays taking place unlike any other game I know.

Leslie Philipp's avatar

Great stuff. Totally agree. Good in the new, but miss a bit of the “hostage situation” too.

Stockholm Syndrome? Of sorts? 😯

Baseball Buddha's avatar

I used to love the long afternoon at the ballpark, the excitement of getting there, wandering the stadium, soaking up the sun…

Don Smith's avatar

As usual, you offer a thoughtful and eloquent perspective on the changes. Thank-you.

I too mostly like the these new rules. Pitchcom and the clock seem to be mostly working as intended. Relievers needing to face 3 batters negates the tedium of Larussa-Inspired micromanaging. The better balanced schedule and more interleague play foster fairness and variety. Extra-inning rules add immediate suspense. And while the universal DH has plusses and minuses, it can create some dramatic match-ups. I also think the manager challenge and tech have lessened arguing and ejections, things I’ve never cared for.

And while these seem like a lot of changes, a player or fan from the early 20th Century would still recognize the game they knew. Basic baseball survives.

I also like some of the more organic trends in the game, especially the increased influence of Latin and Asian styles that add multiple layers of interest. Also happy to see footspeed making a comeback. And watching batters adjust to crazy spin rates by going to the opposite field.

Trends I’m not so thrilled with:

Starting pitchers going 4-5 innings

Needing 25+ pitchers for the season

Back-lit, flashing ads and constant messaging

Being told to Make Noise!

Between inning music cranked to 11

Waiters and full meal service in the stands

7th inning loyalty test

Things I miss a bit as an old-timer:

Flannel uniforms with stirrup socks

Guys playing pepper before the game

On-deck batters on one knee with three bats ready

Screwballs

Pop-up slides as the standard

Great nicknames (Scooter, Peewee, Rooster, Cool Papa, Hawk, Choo Choo…)

Home plate umps with Pillow chest protectors

Dirt strip between the mound and home

Complete games

Pitcher tipping his hat to the crowd as he walks off

Thanks again for paying respect to the game’s many mysteries and traditions while remaining open and positive to inevitable change. Such is life.

Wyrd Smythe's avatar

I think in the end it's both. You point out many of the ways baseball is better and more fun in the modern world, and I agree. But the scale and pacing of that same modern world drags baseball into that world. Which I'll grit my teeth and learn to live with (for sake of the game), but couldn't we please get gambling out of the picture? That would be my #1 ask.